Jackson has closed the value gap on Granderson thanks to a breakout 2012 season. (Photo: AP).
When Austin Jackson steps to the plate tonight in the bottom of the first inning, some Yankee fans might be surprised to see the centerfielder’s numbers. Jackson currently ranks third in batting average, on-base percentage and offensive bWAR, while his OPS+ of 150 stands behind only six others. Although it’s probably too soon to call him on of the game’s elite players, it’s not an exaggeration to say Jackson is having an MVP-caliber season.
The Yankees haven’t faced Jackson since April, so the upcoming four game series in Detroit will represent the 25-year old’s first chance to confront the team that drafted him with his breakout season. Since trading Jackson along with right hander Ian Kennedy (to the Diamondbacks) in a three-way deal that netted Curtis Granderson, the Yankees haven’t had much reason to regret the swap, until now that is. Sure, Kennedy’s 20 wins in 2011 probably gave pause to some, but it was easy (although not necessarily accurate) to explain away his success by attributing it to pitching in the weaker NL West. For that reason, many fans, and perhaps even some in the front office, haven’t batted an eyelash over the righty’s performance (especially now that he has drifted back toward league average). Instead, when evaluating the deal, the real comparison has been between Granderson and Jackson, and in 2011, it was no contest.
Average WAR Breakdown of Curtis Granderson Trade
Note: AvgWAR = (bWAR+fWAR)/2. Monetary figure in parenthesis represents each player’s total salary from 2010-2012.
Source: baseball-reference.com and fangraphs.com
Granderson has followed up his outstanding 2011 with another strong season. However, by just about every metric, the 31-year old left handed slugger has taken a significant step back. Meanwhile, the much younger Jackson has reached a level that already stacks up to even Granderson’s very best years. Considering each player’s expected age-related career progression, and the relative salaries they will be making over the next few years, it’s not unreasonable to wonder whether Brian Cashman would secretly take a mulligan on a trade that looked as if it would end up in the win column before this season.
In the two-plus years since the trade was consummated, the apparent upper hand has changed repeatedly. It was too soon to render a verdict after both players’ mediocre 2010, still premature after Granderson had a vastly superior 2011, and just as presumptions now that Jackson has the statistical edge. However, if Jackson is able to maintain above average offense (not to mention an OPS+ of 150) and combine it with his defensive superiority, it’s hard to imagine a scenario in which the Tigers won’t come out ahead in the trade’s final evaluation.
The Yankees will be faced with a tough call when Granderson’s contract expires after the 2013 season.
Normally, the Yankees’ financial resources would be a factor mitigating the imbalance between future potential and immediate impact, but with the team seemingly committed to remaining below the luxury tax threshold beginning in 2014, that may no longer be the case. Before that season, a soon-to-be 33-year old Granderon will be a free agent, and the Yankees will be presented with the dilemma of whether to offer a lucrative contract extension to a player who is still productive, but likely on the downside. At the same time, Jackson will be entering his prime, as well as his final two years of arbitration eligibility, making him a much more cost effective option for a team on a budget. So, even if Granderson winds up providing more value than Jackson over the foreseeable future, the financial implications could still be detrimental to the Yankees.
Curtis Granderson was acquired under the old CBA rules, so evaluating the trade based upon the new financial realities is presumptuous. However, if the organization remains committed to its austerity plan, the financial implications of the trade will become very relevant by 2014. In that sense, the final assessment of the deal might not be based on the relative performance of the players involved, but how much money the Yankees are willing to spend when it comes time to either re-sign Granderson of find his replacement.
Honestly, as much as I really like Curtis, I don’t think it makes sense for him to be brought back after next season.
To me, he’s become a 1 dimensional player, a home run hitter. He does walk a decent amount, but he strikes out far too much for my liking.
Additionally, his fielding has really deteriorated. His UZR is terrible, and just from the naked eye you can see that he does not take good routes to the ball (see Ciriaco double a week or so ago as a prime example). Who knows how he’d do if he transitioned to LF in a swap with Gardner.
I can’t complain too much though, he’s on his way to another 40 home run year and probably another next.
But at his age, I don’t think it’ll be worth a long term deal.
That’s a fair assessment. Not specific to Granderson, but the Yankees are really facing a potential problem with their lineup, which realistically only has one player who will be close his prime around 2014, when the Yankees are eager to protect their profit margin. If the team adheres to its new policy of fiscal restraint, they’ll need to start developing position players in the minors.
Keep Granderson through 2013, sign Jackson when he becomes a free agent. Yankees win by getting the best of both of them.
I’m kidding on one level, but I still can’t get my mind around the total obsession fans have with trying to ensure they can claim their favorite team has “won the trade.”
All teams got something out of this they needed. The Yankees wanted a new CFer and also needed a LH’d bat with pop. That’s what they got. They all won. Sorry, I guess that doesn’t make for good copy.